THIS IS WHO WE ARE

This is what we do for the joy of the King,
For His peaceable Kingdom,
For a world in despair.
And this is why we bring any hope we can give,
Any bread from the table,
Any touch of His hand.
This is what we do.
This is where we go.
This is why we sing.
This is how we live.
This is who we are.


Saturday, February 16, 2008

Two Down

I had a blast yesterday afternoon with the first 2 installments of my weekend Oscar Movie Marathon.  Went to Bella Terra, ate an Asian Chicken Salad at Pei Wei then headed to the BT Theatres.

I honestly knew nothing about either of the films I was going to watch.  I'd heard some general reviews, but without any storyline detail.  I never saw a trailer to either of them.  I DID know that both were based on existing material, but that was it. (Whether that material was a book, short story, or true life experience I had no clue.)  I'd heard both films hyped on TV for their great direction and cinematography, but again, no details.  Truly, I was as blank a slate as I've ever been prior to watching a movie. 

There Will Be Blood was the first film I saw.  I recall hearing a couple reviewers going on and on about how boring the movie was, and how shocked they were that it was nominated.  So I was expecting to have trouble staying awake for the 2.5+ hour epic.  

One of my first impressions of the movie was the powerful "contemporary art music" that was the core of the score.  The opening bars of the music reminded me of one of the most startling compositions of the 20th century:  Polish composer Krystof Penderecki's Threnody To The Victims of Hiroshima, an orchestral depiction of the atomic destruction of the Japanese city in 1946. Needless to say, that brought me to the edge of my seat.  I thought to myself, "Good grief, what IS this movie about?"

About 20 minutes of grueling (depressing?) visual exposition passed before the first word of "dialogue" was spoken.  (Actually, it was a long but beautifully delivered monologue by the amazing Daniel Day-Lewis.)  I don't believe I've ever seen a Lewis film, but I've heard of his reputation as an actor.  Let me just go on record here to say that I will be shocked if any of the four other actors nominated could possibly have delivered a more spectacular performance. He is definitely worthy of Oscar gold.   Although you absolutely HATE his character (Daniel Plainview), you are completely swept away by his gut-wrenching, jaw-dropping rendering.  

The story is based on Upton Sinclair's novel Oil.  (I found this out in the closing credits.) The film (and, I assume, the book) reveals the desolate world of the turn-of-the-century far west. You receive quite the education on the formidable (and dangerous) task of pulling oil from the earth.  I'm almost tempted to read Sinclair's book for more detail, but I think I've had enough exposure to Daniel Plainview for a lifetime.  I DO think I'll buy the soundtrack...I've never heard that kind of music used in a major film.  Everything from full orchestra to solo piano to string quartet to "mechanical." Quite unique.

For those of us in "church work" (I hate that phrase!), it should be noted that most of the tension in the movie is between a scary, weird-o minister (of the scary, weird-o "Church of the Third Revelation") and the scary, weird-o oilman, Plainview.  The actor who plays that minister is Paul Dano.  (He was Dwayne, the gothic teen brother in last year's Little Miss Sunshine.)  I thought he gave an incredible performance also...certainly worthy of a supporting actor nomination (which he didn't receive).  One of my favorite scenes is when the preacher manipulates Plainview into a "conversion" experience--complete with pseudo confession and baptism.  So much for high-pressure "evangelism."

Do I recommend it? Well, if you're willing to invest nearly 3 hours into an intense psycho-drama full of unlikable (but fascinating) characters, go for it.  It's definitely not a feel-good film, even though the final line is hilarious (and quotable) in its context. 

If you NEED a feel-good film, definitely DO NOT see No Country for Old Men!  I was angry when this came to an end because nothing really was "concluded."  Not even the "let the audience draw its own conclusion" type ending.   I don't require "happy" endings, but I do prefer some kind of closure.  That doesn't really happen with NCFOM.  
To be fair to the Brothers Coen, the movie's makers, I learned after watching the film that they had been completely faithful to Cormac McCarthy's book.  So I guess I should focus my discontent upon Mr. McCarthy.  I guess I'm a "structure snob" when it comes to books and screenplays.  I expect some "norms" to be followed.  [Spoiler Warning:  Skip to next paragraph if you plan to see the film "innocently."]   I was really bummed when the protagonist into whom I'd invested a lot of emotional energy, got "killed-off" two-thirds of the way into the film.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. McCARTHY!!!

A shout-out to the casting agents for the film, however.  I love the "realness" of the minor characters: the general store owner, the chicken farmer, the trailer park lady, and the mother-in-law.  They were all such fun to watch and listen to.

"Violent" would be an understatement in describing this movie. Perhaps a better title  for THIS film would have been,  There Will Be Blood--Again and Again and Again.  (Hmm...guess that wouldn't fly, huh?)  Mercy!  Like Bob Ewing (one of the ministers at our church) warned me before seeing it, "You'll never be comfortable around an air compressor again."  (If you've seen the movie, you know what that means!)  It would have been pretty unbearable if it weren't for the unexpected moments of VERY funny quips that are so typical of the Coens' films.  In spite of all the uneasiness that the film evokes, it does deal with some real-life truisms:  
  • Things don't always end well.
  • Victims are usually good, innocent people.
  • There are truly evil people out there.
  • Evil people are often extremely intelligent and crafty.
  • The love of money is the root of all (most) evil.
If you go see this film, just know you won't "like" the ending.  You may nod your head with the grim truth of it, but you won't like it.  

I hope.


4 comments:

Roni said...

Don, we were at Bella Terra last night, too! We ate at Islands and then saw "Juno," which I'm sure you'll like a lot more! ~Roni

Don said...

We're going to that one tonight!!! Real human beings!

Brazenlilly said...

Hey Don! I was totally thrilled to see your post. I was just thinking last night as I read my EW magazine, that I want to know more about these two movies, but I don't think I want to see them. I can do "war" violence, and even cowboy shoot 'em up violence, but it sounds like these two movies are more unique and disturbing, so I think I'll pass. HOWEVER, I was wishing that I could talk to someone who had seen them, so they could describe and recap for me what I was missing. The other three nominated movies I will/have seen. Your post was exactly what I was looking for! Thanks for all the interesting insights.

-Jenbunch

Dan Mayes said...

Don. I loved There Will Be Blood. Daniel Day Lewis has played some great love-to-hate characters. Check out the Gangs of New York for another great one. I think a lot of people didn't like it because our culture hasn't been very well exposed to good literature (or other arts for that matter) so we're not accustomed to tragedies. We've been a bit conditioned towards feel good endings.

I've been wanting to see No Country For Old Men, so thanks for the review. I just finished reading McCarthy's latest work The Road, which is incredible. I'm beginning his first work The Orchard Keeper. Apparently leaving business unresolved is his usual prerogative.